News 3 Now ·  Desktop WX ·  Contact ·  Site Map
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Features  ·   Business  ·   Morning Show  ·   The Buzz  ·   Eye on You (Your Photos & Videos)  ·   KBTX Cares
At the Movies · Eat.Stay.Play. · Contest · Calendar · Lottery · Blogs · Inside KBTX · Job Search · Obituaries · CW Texas · CBS · Digital TV · Gas Prices
SpeakOut Poll
There are currently no active polls at this time.
Click here to view other polls on our site and past poll results.
Community Links
CSISD Addresses Handling of Terroristic Threat Save Email Print
Posted: 9:48 PM Apr 21, 2008
Last Updated: 11:22 AM Apr 22, 2008
Reporter: Steve Fullhart
Email Address: fullhart@kbtx.com

A | A | A

Did College Station ISD handle a terroristic threat at a middle school properly?

There is a variety of opinions in this case of a College Station Middle Schooler's false claims of a homemade explosive device. No notice was sent home to parents following the incident, in which a student was subdued after showing a powder-filled vial with wires hanging out of it.

The student claimed he could cause an explosion with the vile, which was later found out to be harmless.

For a number of them picking kids up from College Station Middle School Monday, Friday's terroristic threat came as news to them, but they'd rather have heard about it through the district than from a news reporter.

"I know it might take a lot of ink, but sufficed to say, I would rather have known," said one mother, Tammy Canatella.

"The school should have notified the students," said another mother, Tammy Martin. "Maybe some of the students were aware. I don't know."

"Obviously, any threat is serious, but there was not a need to go beyond the room because the student was isolated," said CSISD Superintendent Eddie Coulson.

Coulson says they take any threat of any kind on any campus very seriously and on a case-by-case basis. In handling this situation, he says they took into account the fact that the student was isolated to a certain portion of the building, that the adult were there working with that student, and that the main student body was not heavily threatened in any way, shape or form.

"Given different circumstances, it may require something different from us, but for this particular case, absolutely, the right call was made," Coulson said.

And there are parents who agree, like Alice Wiese, who got word that day from her son.

"He said they'd had some problems, but everything was settled, and he was not upset with it," Wiese said. "If he's not upset, there's not a reason for me to be upset."

More Stories
Suspended Bryan Police Officer Will Not Face Charges

Crime Stoppers Seeks Pair of Fugitives

Two Women Charged in Magnolia Drug Bust

Katy Man Pleads Not Guilty to Killing Two Burleson County Men

Noey Turns Himself In, Charged with Providing Alcohol to Minors

Prairie View A&M Professor Comments on "Noose" Debate

Parents Weigh in on Bryan Truancy Pilot Program

Accident Slows Traffic on Highway 6 at OSR

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anonymous Location: Bryan on Apr 26, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Has BISD addressed the assault from a few week back? CISD did make a decision.

Posted by: EJ Location: Bryan on Apr 22, 2008 at 05:40 PM
Seems to me all the complainers are just that; complainers. They will gripe regardless of what action was taken. Be thankful that the staff has the guts to make a decision. If you were in their shoes, no doubt you would freak out.

Posted by: Anonymous on Apr 22, 2008 at 03:30 PM
"I find it odd when a white student does something of this sort it will be kept a secret for a while, but it would be news on the spot if the child was hispanic or black." Was the kid white? I didn't get that from the article; the student could have been a 3 ft 2 inch gay black girl named Kobayashi Morales for all we know...

Posted by: anni on Apr 22, 2008 at 02:52 PM
Joe - you are being honest about your opinion. Not the facts. Paul - if a kid acts really bad he gets sent to the office, ISS or home. If a legally classified adaptive behavior student is having issues that disrupt an entire class, he/she gets sent to the Adaptive Behavior room. There is a complete and thorough (and long) process to be labeled "adaptive behavior."

Posted by: Rhonda Location: Bryan, TX on Apr 22, 2008 at 02:38 PM
Paragraph 3: The word "vile" should be spelled "vial." Paragraph 8: Reads "the adult were there working with that student" should read "adults."

Posted by: Joe on Apr 22, 2008 at 01:27 PM
I find it odd when a white student does something of this sort it will be kept a secret for a while, but it would be news on the spot if the child was hispanic or black. Just being honest.

Posted by: john Location: College Station on Apr 22, 2008 at 12:43 PM
"The district can't have it both ways.....charge the student with terroristic threat then turn around and say there was no danger." Why not? At the time the threat was made, no one outside the classroom knew about it, and by the time the head office was informed, the situation had been resolved. But the kid still needs to learn that making threats (with or without the ability to back them up) is a very serious crime, which COULD have gotten him or her dead if the teacher had backed off and called for an evacuation rather than taking the "bomb" away. But I do agree with those who think that the parents SHOULD have been emailed a copy of the release to the press.

Posted by: Paul Location: Bryan on Apr 22, 2008 at 12:43 PM
I have serious questions about whether schools should have "Adaptive Behavior" classes at all. Put a child in there, and the message is that this is a place for you to be bad. It's expected. There's a special room for you to do this in. Authority figures have deemed you bad, so you act accordingly. Readers, consider this. Say you're involved in community theater. You're going to play Hamlet. OK. You will act a certain way on stage. Playing Harold Hill in THE MUSIC MAN? Another set of behaviors. Stanley Kowalski in A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE? Shift acting gears again. Bad behavior is expected in Adaptive Behavior. It's the role the very young actor is cast in.

Posted by: aggie Location: college station on Apr 22, 2008 at 12:11 PM
It makes no sense to me not to have informed the partents. It is not what if or maybe question. When the real thing happens what do you intend to do. how are you going toget these parents to get kids or are you just going to bus them out? come up with a plan you appently don't have one. get real i am glad all of mine are grown.

Posted by: Diand Location: College Station on Apr 22, 2008 at 11:01 AM
School administrators are in the best position to evaluate a situation and determine how to respond. In fact, I am relieved that administrators consider each incident on a case-by-case basis in order to ensure timely, appropriate responses that do not endanger students or escalate the situation unnecessarily. What should be paramount in this discussion is that the child was isolated from other students, he was under a teacher’s supervision and the district did notify the public in a timely manner. While these incidents are happening all too frequently, this is another example of our school administrators and teachers doing what is appropriate and prudent in the best interest of our children.. Well done CSISD!

Posted by: concerned Location: cs on Apr 22, 2008 at 10:53 AM
to much computer and tv...

Posted by: Parent Location: College Station on Apr 22, 2008 at 10:24 AM
First, I do not know all the facts but I do agree that a quiet evacuation might have been a step to show the school system was taking all possible "What If's" under consideration. A follow up of a short note to parents and students to let them know a incident did occur. The media just reported the incident and opened up remarks to the public which might have been avoided had a notice been given the day before. It is obvious that the "Special Education Student" was acting out and is looking for ways to be heard. This incident could have a positive spin by looking at the needs of Special Education and doing what we can as Parents, Educators and Administrators to improve the quality of life for everyones future. These are challenging times for our kids, remember a kind word or simple smile might make the difference to one child before you judge. Some children will need a little more then a smile ---be there, it might help, you don't know till you try. No one is perfect.

Posted by: Bryan Student Location: Bryan on Apr 22, 2008 at 09:16 AM
I went to College Station schools for many years and never once did they ever act the way Bryan schools did when it came to serious matters. Most people would say College Station is a better place than Bryan but look at this situation they didn't even have the guts to tell the kids parents about what happened. Regardless of if it was real or not they should have told the parents.

Posted by: Parent Location: College Station on Apr 22, 2008 at 08:33 AM
The district can't have it both ways.....charge the student with terroristic threat then turn around and say there was no danger. If they really thought it was a bomb, how would they know it wouldn't blow up the whole building, not just one room.

Posted by: Anonymous Location: College Station on Apr 22, 2008 at 08:26 AM
The schools have no problem sending email and mailing my home when they want money for whatever they are doing at the moment. Could that school not have simply used the same email list it uses to solicit donations through the PTO or whatever to inform the parents of "an incident" in the adaptive behavior room. Then posted a notice of the situation on the front door of the school for parents that were concerned. CSISD could have handled this much better. Parents absolutely have a right to know the details, and the district could have done this without breaking any laws. It could have been handled any number of ways. Parents should not hear about this type of thing on the news.

Posted by: sp Location: college station on Apr 22, 2008 at 07:56 AM
Everyone needs to realize this is a SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENT. We don't know the nature of the disability, but we do see how the district "helps". They have "helped" many Special Ed students, straight to prison.

Posted by: k Location: college station on Apr 22, 2008 at 07:18 AM
maybe a quiet evacuation should have been done just in case the substance was harmful

Posted by: in the district Location: cs on Apr 22, 2008 at 07:10 AM
The student was isolated, student body not heavily threatened, device harmless. The school knew there was no threat. The "device" was probably something in the classroom from science. Maybe this student’s parent complained about the "adaptive behavior" program. This is what you get when you "isolate" (Mr. Coulson's words) these kids. From FEAR comes anger, frustration and humiliation. Lock all of that in one room, and this is what you get. Sounds like another student the district wanted to get rid of.

Posted by: CS Location: College Station on Apr 22, 2008 at 06:51 AM
I am NOT outraged by how it was handled. I promise you every "threat" is taken seriously by CSISD. This was NEVER a threat, and I am disappointed, though not surprised, that the media has made this such a big deal. Here's what you SHOULD investigate: you wouldn't believe what goes on in the Adaptive Behavior classrooms all over the district on a daily basis. Those kids have thrown desks at teachers and blown out one teacher's ACL. They're a danger to have in the building with other children; yet, they are protected by the Federal Government and placed in classrooms with innocent children. Why are they allowed in our schools? THAT outrages me!

KBTX.com Video Player
AP Video
Digital TV