A Call to Hang Up the Cell Phone
WEATHER ALERT: A Severe Thunderstorm Watch is in effect for Houston and Trinity counties until 10:00 p.m. Keep up to date with KBTX Media for the latest weather developments.
A Call to Hang Up the Cell Phone Save Email Print
Posted: 6:16 PM Jan 14, 2009
Last Updated: 10:48 PM Jan 14, 2009
Reporter: Kristen Ross
Email Address: ross@kbtx.com

A | A | A

It's a call to ban cell phone use while driving.

The National Safety Council says it's a dangerous practice that leads to an increased risk for car crashes and fatalities.

Studies have found nearly 3,000 deaths, and 12,000 injuries each year are caused by cell phone use while driving. So now the safety group is advocating a total ban of the device, while traveling on the road.

Most people are guilty of it.

"Both texting and calling actually," Motorist Bryan Williams said.

Whether it be sending off a few messages while waiting for the light to turn green, or returning a few phone calls while on the road.

It's a technology many of us now depend on, and some feel is driving motorists to distraction.

"When I'm texting, yeah, you'll look up and cars you don't remember being by you are there," Williams said. "It's just not safe because you're not completely paying attention to what's going on."

That's why safety groups, like the National Safety Council, are now pushing for a complete ban of cell phone use while driving.

"I think any of us who have driven have experienced the situation where you follow a person using a cell phone and witness their driving behavior is not up to standard," Quinn Brackett with the Texas Transportation Institute said.

Brackett says they've conducted their own simulator studies; where they've asked people to drive or attempt to drive a certain simulator course. Once without a phone, then while chatting it up on the phone and texting.

The results aren't to surprising.

"We found that it increased the risk of distraction and the likelihood of making an error while driving," Brackett said. "If you're going to use them it's much better to pull over and park on the side of the road to use it."

But for motorists like Skip Dent, who says he does most his business by phone while driving to his next job, the idea of pulling over each time he gets a call just doesn't have a ring to it.

"I feel like you're a target sitting on the shoulder," Dent said as his cell phone begins to ring. "There you go, see but I'm not driving. Hello?"

Currently no state bans the complete use of cell phones while driving, but six states have imposed tougher cell phones rules.

California, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Utah and Washington, and the District of Columbia only allow hands-free devices to be used when behind the wheel.

For more information click on the link below:


Related Links
More Stories
Texas Hurricanes Kickoff Scheduled For 8:00 p.m.

McNair Death Investigation Continues, Ruled Homicide

Cowboys Stadium Likely Off Limits for Drilling

Its A Wrap On July 4th!

Tea Party on July 4th

Navasota Celebrates Independence Day with Parade, Celebration

Former NFL Quarterback McNair Killed in Tennessee

Man Dies In Early-Morning Texas Shooting

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: IsamarCruz Location: NewHaven on Feb 6, 2009 at 07:11 PM
hi can you get me a phone that is so nice and that is a razer

Posted by: j.b Location: bryan on Jan 19, 2009 at 02:20 PM
i think we should ban them while driving within 20 feet of a soon to be no smoking area....

Posted by: Katrina C Location: Wellborn on Jan 19, 2009 at 12:52 PM
I do agree that you should not be able to physically have the phone in your hand or held to your ear by your shoulder, but like stated by someone that blue tooth should be allowed. My husband has a job that requires him to carry and answer his cell phone 24/7/365. He uses blue tooth for his calls because he is always driving, he's never had an accident, he still has both hands free and it's honestly no different than talking to a passenger in your car. A complete ban, I do believe is completely uncalled for, but for tighter legislation, yes. If you don't have blue tooth or some type of hands free that you're using, don't answer your phone.

Posted by: diane Location: bryan,tx on Jan 16, 2009 at 10:56 PM
well first of all i am all the way with the law.one because i have been behind some people that dont stay off the phones .and dont see what they are doing .and you try to honk at them .and they get mad at you and stick the finger at you just because you honk at them at the light so i hope the law passes i am for it.and as for you .ct at 1045 am on 1-15 -09 .one may be no one wants to talk to you dont hate .and for you laura.1-15-09-at 944 am i am for it all the way.so please pass it

Posted by: No Obama Location: The Country on Jan 16, 2009 at 05:37 PM
The time is here that big government is too involved in our everyday life. Pretty soon the cops and politicians will be telling us when to use the toilet. When the prez-elect is even involved, at the lowest level, with cable tv converter boxes (!!!!!!) then thats a clear sign that the government has grown like cancer. Come on people...Is this really what you wanted????

Posted by: To Common Sensless on Jan 16, 2009 at 12:26 PM
"It isn't my fault many people don't have enough brains to do two things at once." Nor is it your fault that morons get behind the wheel with BACs over 0.2, but I don't see that as a reason to repeal the laws prohibiting DWI... The important fact is that many people DO lose track of the road while they are talking on the cell, and unlike changing CDs and checking the GPS which are momentary and listening to a radio that's just background noise, a lot of cellulites act brain dead from before they crank the engine until after they release their seat belt to get out. And there are are a WHOLE LOT of innocent victims in their path during that time.

Posted by: TIM Location: Bryan on Jan 15, 2009 at 09:13 PM
If you get a phone call then pull into a parking lot and return the call. Good grief, it is not that hard to figure out. If it is, then you shouldnt't be driving and talking at the same time . And another thing, just because you haven't had an accident while on cell phone be thankful. Secondly, do you want to see a person who just got their license driving a talking on a cell. Too many people and too many distractions are on the roads today, and then you complain that vehicles aren't safe enough. The vehicles are very safe, it is the person operating the vehicle that need to take responsibility for themselves and the other person.

Posted by: from where Location: will you call on Jan 15, 2009 at 06:42 PM
"I will be calling the law every time I see them though with their license plate! I'm sick of it!" GOOD ONE TJ!!, are you going to call them when you get home? or are you going to get on YOUR cell phone and call them? "hello police?, i'm following a jerk that is talking on the cell phone, can you send an officer so that they stop that jerk that is on the phone, thank you"

Posted by: Common Sense on Jan 15, 2009 at 05:10 PM
Ditto Mike, The nana-babies are out in full force on this one. It isn't my fault many people don't have enough brains to do two things at once. Just you wait, if this nana-law passes, the next thing to go will be GPS devices, All-Star, blue tooth phones, radar detector, in dash DVD players, and then your radio. Of course, if this passes: law enforcement would be exempt because they are holy and can do no wrong. I have seen police playing with their laptops while in traffic. The nanas better think hard about your actions before you vote yes on this.

Posted by: To James on Jan 15, 2009 at 12:35 PM
"Go ahead... make me a criminal. Feel better about yourself?" 11 months ago, two friends of mine were driving on 610 in Houston and when they had to slow down for the choke point at 59, a jerk arranging an appointment on his Cell plowed into them at 70 mph. One of my friends spent a week in the hospital, and the other is now driving a much cheaper and older car, because that's all the other guy's insurance would pay. The yakker got a $200 fine and maybe a higher insurance premium. And when (not if) you do the same, I have no doubt that you (just like him) will think that even that's too harsh a penalty for an "unavoidable accident". But, I suspect your victims WILL DISAGREE... and if I can stop you from doing to somebody else what this guy did to my buds, I WILL feel a LOT better about myself.

Posted by: wendy Location: cs on Jan 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM
To all of you on this board who are against banning talking or texting on cell phones while driving. You might feel differently if a member of your family was killed in an auto accident under these circumstances. Ask me, I know how it feels . . .

Posted by: CT Location: Brazos Valley on Jan 15, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Stop taking away our rights!! All you people that are for this are just mad because nobody calls your cell phone.

Posted by: To Cynthia Location: Hearne on Jan 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM
Sounds like you need to get your lazy but up earlier!!!! If people can drive from Calvert/Hearne and be to work on time at 8:00 and have makeup on, so can you!! I am all for banning the cell phone on the road. There is way too many (especially on Hwy 6) people on the road and on the cell phone and not paying a bit attention. Then people wonder why Hwy 6 has so many accidents.

Posted by: ma bell on Jan 15, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Stop D W T, Texas

Posted by: Victor Location: College Station on Jan 15, 2009 at 10:01 AM
I am for banning cell phone use while driving but i dont think that is the answer. Even Police officers are seen on the mobile phone while driving. Even though an individual can use a hands free or blue tooth device, ultimately its up to the driver to practice proper driving skills. I believe it is plan and simple, pay attention to how you are driving.

Posted by: laura Location: college station on Jan 15, 2009 at 09:44 AM
I am for the ban. I always feel that I am driving TWO vehicles when I see someone on the phone when I am driving behind them. PLEASE LET THIS PASS.

Posted by: Mike Location: Texas on Jan 15, 2009 at 09:17 AM
Just another way for the state/country to make money via big brother. Power hungry politicians just trying to find another way to keep America down. Unfortunately, it will get worse.

Posted by: adriana Location: college station on Jan 15, 2009 at 09:09 AM
If the state is planning on banning cell phone use then it should also include all law enforcments as well. Also what if there's an emergency and you have to call someone, why stop on the shoulder and be a target for another car to hit you if they aren't even paying attention if they aren't even talking on the phone while driving. This is so stupid to ban call phones while driving. The state needs to be worried about all the construction on the road they they have been working on for the past 10 years and still aren't finished and that's where the majority of the accidents occur because of the state with there stupid construction that they never finish!!! By the way who ever typed up this article needs to learn how to spell correctly!!!

Posted by: Cynthia Location: BCS on Jan 15, 2009 at 08:47 AM
Okay, lets talk about distractions. I drive down the road every morning and put my make-up on, and make my ponytail while driving, however I do bluetooth my cell to my GPS and talk on it. So Im not stopping the make-up nor the ponytail. Woman have so many chores and things to get done until we run out of time. So if you wanna ban cell phones do it, but I have to have the make-up!!!

Posted by: tj Location: bryan on Jan 15, 2009 at 08:41 AM
GREAT! I am so tired of following these jerks who are driving and talking on their cell phones! They drive slow and are NOT paying attention to the road!!!!! GO HOME and talk on the phone but not while you are driving a car ...you crazy people; I see young mothers with babies in the car ... people who are just not paying attention! They get themselves slowly through the lights while talking on the phones usually running the tail end of a yellow or red light when if they would have been going the speed limit at least 2 others cars could have made the same light! Yes ... get rid of the CELL PHONES! They should be for emergencies ONLY! Even if they ban them... there will still be some jerks out there; still trying to use them while driving! I will be calling the law every time I see them though with their license plate! I'm sick of it!

Posted by: Driller on Jan 15, 2009 at 06:19 AM
Take just one more right form us

Posted by: James Location: Bryan on Jan 15, 2009 at 02:38 AM
More NANNY STATE silliness. We're willingly surrendering our liberties, one by one. All of you who are for this garbage (and who are for the smoking ban) will one day rue these times. I talk on my phone while driving EVERY day. My job depends on it. Go ahead... make me a criminal. Feel better about yourself?

Posted by: debs Location: bryan on Jan 14, 2009 at 10:38 PM
Would be nice it were passed. Saw a police car and the police officer was on her cell phone. She has a radio in the car for emergencies and sure does not need to use her cell phone while driving. Followed her the whole way to the destination and she was still on it and that was about 10 to 15 minutes. All we can do is hope that there are no accidents while using the phone but we all know that there have been many.

Posted by: Give me a break Location: CS on Jan 14, 2009 at 10:17 PM
While we're at it let's ban other distractions like putting on make up, talking to other passengers, kids in the back seat, changing radio channels/CD's, smoking and girls jogging in shorts within 100 feet of the street. If these were put to the same test they would cause more crashes also.

Posted by: if only they will Location: hearne on Jan 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM
i agree with the ban. but it should also include law enforcement. how do they plan on enforcing when they are not obeying the laws.

Posted by: Woody Location: College Station on Jan 14, 2009 at 09:38 PM
Also ban eating and singing while you drive. Both of those involve some form of distraction Oh and don't forget loud music. That's all! I got a phone call! HaHa Dumb Laws top 10 for sure.

Posted by: anonymous Location: b/cd on Jan 14, 2009 at 08:06 PM
nice try, unfortunately people will not listen, there has been many calls for people to stop drinking and driving and we all know how that one is going

Posted by: hello Location: wait till i pull over on Jan 14, 2009 at 07:43 PM
bring it to TEXAS

Posted by: Mike Location: cs on Jan 14, 2009 at 07:38 PM
Ok dummy, the shoulder is for emergencies. Dont sit there and make a call. If its that darn important, find a parking lot. I'm sure hoping this law passes.

Posted by: LEO Location: CS on Jan 14, 2009 at 07:16 PM
I support their finding.

Posted by: Rick Location: College Station on Jan 14, 2009 at 06:58 PM
While I agree that hands off devices should be required, I don't feel that total ban is the answer. How many crashes will be caused by a driver trying to pull to the shoulder so he/she can answer the phone before missing the call? As a former traffic cop, I know for a fact that cell phone use is just one of many distractions that cause crashes. Quite a few folks have crashed changing the CD or the radio station, shall we ban sound systems too? Trying to read street signs, glare from the sun are also frequent causes of driver inattention, there you go, let's ban the sun. Bottom line: be responsible in your actions don't text while driving, use a blue tooth hands off device and drive like everyone out there is a complete idiot and you will be much safer.

AP Video
JobSearch Recent Listings
The following list shows the 5 most recent jobs posted on the Job Board at KBTX.com. View More Jobs.
Digital TV
Backyard BBQ