News 3 Now ·  Desktop WX ·  Contact ·  Site Map
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Features  ·   Business  ·   Morning Show  ·   The Buzz  ·   Eye on You (Your Photos & Videos)  ·   KBTX Cares
Top Stories · National · State · Local · Business · Entertainment · Texas A&M News · College News · BCSPolitics.com · Trans-Texas Corridor News
Features - Click To Expand
Wind Watts: What CS Utilities Hopes for Customers Save Email Print
Posted: 3:10 PM Jul 25, 2008
Last Updated: 12:52 PM Jul 28, 2008
Reporter: Steve Fullhart
Email Address: fullhart@kbtx.com

A | A | A

As we told you earlier this week, College Station residents are getting the option to have some or all of their power come from wind energy. A wind farm is rising in West Texas, and utility leaders hope residents will jump on board, even with a catch.

They're not towering like the turbines of Sweetwater yet, but near Abilene, some 30 pilars of wind energy are being constructed, and College Station is in on the deal.

By 2015, an estimated 30 percent of energy out of the South Trent Mesa Wind Farm will go through ERCOT's grid and to College Station.

By 2009?

"We have enough energy coming in to where we could actually supply up to 3,000 customers with full wind," said College Station Utilities Director David Massey. "The way the numbers are looking right now, I really would not doubt that we'd have a thousand customers signed up by September."

A year-and-a-half ago, College Station's elected leaders signed off on the deal, no cost up front to the city, but of course, a portion of your bill going back to the farm, and therein lies the catch of sorts.

You can either have 10 percent, half or all of your power supplied from wind through the Wind Watts program. CSU says the average customer is paying around $105 each month. If you'd opt for the 10 percent option in Wind Watts, you'd pay an estimated $3.50 or $4 more each month. If you go for full wind, your bill would rise $30 a month.

So why should a person who's pay more than ever for food and fuel spend more on energy?

"I believe from what I've heard from customers who are interested in it is that it makes them feel good to know that they're doing something for the environment long-term," Massey said, adding they've got 100 customers already signed up without having gone full-boar on their Wind Watts campaign, and with a lot of younger customers out of school and out of town.

"Natural gas prices are very high , but the supply is short, and anything you can do to make that better is just going to be better for everyone in the long run," Massey said.

So says the company that hopes their interest in West Texas wind brings change to many.

Right now, all power coming to College Station customers is natural gas-based according to Massey. That will not only change with the addition of wind power, but in 2010, College Station Utilities plans on adding coal powered energy to their mix.

Click on the link below to find more information on Wind Watts through the city. You'll find a link to an FAQ section on that page.


Related Links
More Stories
Suspended Bryan Police Officer Will Not Face Charges

Crime Stoppers Seeks Pair of Fugitives

Two Women Charged in Magnolia Drug Bust

Prairie View A&M Professor Comments on "Noose" Debate

Accident Slows Traffic on Highway 6 at OSR

Noey Turns Himself In, Charged with Providing Alcohol to Minors

Bryan Resident Arrested in CS Hit and Run

Rudder High Dedicated with General's Family on Hand

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: John Location: College Station on Jul 29, 2008 at 06:25 AM
It seems to me that a smart reporter would look into this wind energy thing in more detail. Clearly, the 100% wind power electricity is not posible - so maybe this is a scam. The wind does NOT blow all the time. In addition, wind turbines are only used if the wind blows within certain "speed limits." If the wind is above or below these limts, the turbines are locked down so they will not turn. Where does the elctricity come from then? An interesting question whose answer will show that 100% wind-power electricity is a MYTH!

Posted by: Bobby Walters Location: Centerville on Jul 28, 2008 at 04:45 PM
I thought wind was free. How can it cost more if the wind is free? Why not put a windmill in your own backyard for your house and sell the excess back to the utility company. If they can/t pay you your bill you cut them off like they do you.

Posted by: Matt Location: Bryan on Jul 28, 2008 at 04:20 PM
"Greener energy" should be "cheaper energy"

Posted by: Doris Location: Wellborn on Jul 28, 2008 at 04:12 PM
I won't pay more for something because I don't feel guilty. Like DW said, trees like CO2. I gurantee there are more trees in Brazod County now than there were 30 years ago.

Posted by: John D. Location: Bryan on Jul 28, 2008 at 02:26 PM
This makes no sense.... Our society want us to eat breath and be enviromentaly friendly, but it cost more.. If the prices were reversed, as junk food cost more than healther foods, cost of "greener fuels" cost less than fossils, etc., it would be a better... But its the other way around.. No wonder our world is ozone eaten, over weight, diabetic, cant breath society.. We cant afford it.....

Posted by: DW Location: college station on Jul 28, 2008 at 12:50 PM
The global warming "hoax" is finally paying off. Dummies are actually signing up to pay more for the same utilities to reduce CO2,,,,,to save a tree??? What do they think the trees live off of? It is 103 today because it is summer time in Texas. It is not global warming! Time and News Week Magazines both published articles in July 1974 claiming, that by now, the world would be covered with ice, due to "environmental cooling". What happened to that? Good point dj.

Posted by: Cecelia Location: Bryan on Jul 28, 2008 at 12:16 PM
I can't afford what we have now; I sure can't afford more expense. When they make things affordable, then we can consider alternatives. People in upper income levels and still working, may be alright with paying more for everything, but those on lower and fixed incomes can't manage all these increases.

Posted by: dj Location: college station on Jul 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM
Green energy is considerably less expensive. Why would anyone agree to pay more? Even an entire nuclear energy plant leaves less of a "carbon footprint" than Al Gore's house and nuclear energy is a lot cheaper than electricity. It is also safe (Chernobyl was a catastrophe, but they did not have any safety standards).

Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 28, 2008 at 09:35 AM
Ole T Bone figures that since Congress is getting ready to tax all the profits out of his oil wells, he's gotta get more money elsewhere; I fugure he's probably working on getting an energy credit for producing "green" energy AND for not raising crops on the desert as well...

Posted by: bill Location: college station on Jul 28, 2008 at 08:05 AM
Green is good but extra cost? Wind is free so the cost must be profit for the windmill makers, huh?

Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 28, 2008 at 07:05 AM
"So are they saying if you get full wind, Will you have to pay an extra on what you are paying for now on your utility bill?" That's exactly what they are saying; if you pay $100 now for gas, you'd pay $130 for all wind. And, of course we'll ALL have to pay a share of the billions needed for the new West Texas transmission lines that are being built out of the common utilities fund, according to other articles...

Posted by: SOmeone Location: College Station on Jul 25, 2008 at 11:22 PM
So are they saying if you get full wind, Will you have to pay an extra on what you are paying for now on your utility bill? Cause thats the way it sounded to me!!

Posted by: Allen Location: Colleg Station on Jul 25, 2008 at 07:26 PM
None of the power to College Station is generated from TMPA, which is a coal powered plant?

AP Video
Digital TV