After an insanely long campaign season, debates are the first opportunity we get to see Barack Obama and Mitt Romney on the same stage, thrashing out their differences in real time. And boy did they thrash last night.
The two presidential contenders traded jab after jab, and spent a whole lot of their time defending their positions in return.
Though the importance of debates has been contested, loads of Americans watch these things: 50 to 60 million viewers tuned in to the first debate last year – so they have some weight.
But in addition to "who won?" – the standard post-debate question – we want to know how "real" the exchange of ideas was, and what the debate revealed about the intentions of the candidates. Or for that matter, the priorities of the journalists asking the questions.
Starting with last night's showdown, we're breaking down each debate – and eventually all four debates too.
Before the first debate, moderator Jim Lehrer issued a public statement that he had selected the very non-obvious topic of the economy for questions 1-3, and healthcare, the role of government and governing for the rest. If that list didn't excite you, neither would his disclaimer: "Subject to possible changes because of news developments ... not necessarily to be brought up in this order."
But despite early rumors of a foreign policy question slipping into the mix, Lehrer didn't change his questions breakdown for any "news developments." Beyond foreign policy – which gets its own debate later on – other hot button issues, such as immigration and women's rights were conspicuously missing from last night's show.
Lehrer's questions on the economy focused on three subjects only: jobs, national debt and entitlements. And on each he simply asked the candidates to define their differences. Lucky for Romney, he was ready.
The candidates then took over, as Lehrer essentially lost control of this debate from the get-go.
Viewers and voters should note that this debate is the only debate on domestic policy. However, the second presidential debate, which is held in a town hall style on October 16 will be open-ended.
We also tracked how Romney and Obama answered Lehrer's questions. Are they "building themselves up" by making references to past accomplishments and resume, or "tearing the other guy down" by launching attacks? Both have their place in politics, but it's useful to know which style the candidates are relying on.
Not counting the candidates' closing remarks, Romney and Obama clocked in eleven direct attacks each over the hour and a half long debate. Romney, who won the evening coin toss and chose to have the last word of the night, used his conclusion to cram in an extra four attacks against the president, while Obama held his tongue at the very end.
Obama, as the incumbent, did give us more background to go on. He referred to his accomplishments 10 times to Romney's paltry 4 mentions of his own record as Governor of Massachusetts.
We also tracked when candidates give us concrete plans and when they make promises for the future – two important indicators of how they would govern if elected.
Last night, both candidates were sparse on details – they gave us relatively few concrete plans for the future, and similarly offered few promises. They spent a lot more of their time on the attack and in defense.
It's notable that Romney, used his concluding remarks to pack in some punch with promises too. During the debate Romney made four promises to the American people, but then added five more promises in his final speech, speaking forcefully to define himself against the president.
ome other things that stuck out to us during this debate, include an early laugh line by Romney; his seemingly unnecessary reference to cutting PBS funding (and, at the same time, loving Big Bird); and Romney and Obama's keywords of the night.
Laugh lines: Who would have thought Mitt Romney would get in the only laugh line of the evening? He snuck in a joke at the very beginning when referring to President's 20th wedding anniversary, which fell on this first debate. After Obama announced it was the big night, Romney riffed:
"I'm sure this was the most romantic place you could imagine here – here with me. So ... Congratulations"
Unexpected turn: While outlining a plan to cut government spending, Mitt Romney said he'd cut unnecessary and wasteful programs. "Obamacare" was first on his list. Second, was PBS. Maybe facing Lehrer gave him the idea ...
"I'm sorry, Jim, I'm going to stop the subsidy to PBS. I'm going to stop other things. I like PBS, I love Big Bird. Actually like you, too. But I'm not going to – I'm not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for."
Keywords of the night:
Both Obama and Romney had some favorite topics last night that they returned to again and again. Obama hammered his connection to the middle class and how he believes "that we do best when the middle class is doing well." Romney tried to define Obama as a big-government-loving Liberal. The catchphrase he rolled out twice was "trickle-down government." Wonder if it'll stick?
The president has a view very similar to the view he had when he ran four years, that a bigger government, spending more, taxing more, regulating more -- if you will, trickle-down government -- would work. That's not the right answer for America. I'll restore the vitality that gets America working again. Thank you.
And what we're seeing right now is, in my view, a -- a trickle-down government approach, which has government thinking it can do a better job than free people pursuing their dreams.
To comment, the following rules must be followed:
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content, but the station is under no legal obligation to do so.
If you believe a comment violates the above rules, please use the Flagging Tool to alert a Moderator.
Flagging does not guarantee removal.
Multiple violations may result in account suspension.
Decisions to suspend or unsuspend accounts are made by Station Moderators.
Questions may be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please provide detailed information.