News 3 Now ·  Desktop WX ·  Contact ·  Site Map
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Features  ·   Business  ·   Morning Show  ·   The Buzz  ·   Eye on You (Your Photos & Videos)  ·   KBTX Cares
Top Stories · National · State · Local · Business · Entertainment · Texas A&M News · College News · BCSPolitics.com · Trans-Texas Corridor News
SpeakOut Poll
Are you watching the Olympics in high definition?

Yes
No
I'm not watching the Olympics
I don't have high definition


Debate Continues Over College Station Growth Save Email Print
Posted: 5:15 PM May 12, 2008
Last Updated: 3:04 PM May 13, 2008
Reporter: Kristen Ross
Email Address: ross@kbtx.com

A | A | A

It was one of the most controversial issues in this weekend's election.

How should the city of College Station pay for growth?

Place 1 City Council winner John Crompton advocated impact fees.

This would make developers foot the bill and pay traffic impact fees as they build new homes.

Some fear this could lead to College Station becoming a mini-Austin, where there are more people coming in, than the city can support.

But former College Station Mayor Larry Ringer says it's best to develop a long term plan now, rather than later.

"It does require commercial development and businesses to provide the tax base. Both sales tax and property tax, it requires employment opportunities for people, so we need to be friendly to that development too," Ringer said. "But we need to have that as part of a well-planned community."

In the end, Ringer says he thinks the fear of high fees may be blown out of proportion. He believes there will be some compromise on both sides before all is said and done.

More Stories
News 3 Investigates High B/CS Gas Prices

Bremond Receives Much Needed Rain

TX-TF1 Deployed to Flooded North Texas

Heavy Rainfall Drenches Texas

4-H Fundraiser Takes the Cake

School Immunizations Offered This Week

A First Glimpse at Reveille VIII

Pain at the Pump Worse in B/CS?

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Dave Nelson Location: College Staton on May 13, 2008 at 08:48 AM
Let's get one thing straight. Professor Crompton supported the limited roommate option for two years, before the flip-flopped, because it was a way of getting renters of all stripes -- not just students -- out of the neighborhoods. Property values increase when the neighborhood is made up entirely of single-family homeowners. Forget the needs of the new public school teachers, service workers, and of course students, for whom multiple tenancy is not just the only affordable option -- but whose existence in this college town lubricates the economy and protects it from the housing-value fluctuations that plague many areas. Those who can only afford to live in the neighborhoods by splitting the rent four ways can be ghettoized elsewhere, right Dr. Crompton? Now that you've won, how soon can we expect to see resurrection of the overlay proposal?

AP Video
Digital TV
Sponsored Headlines